sn.1w6.org
type: Site
name: 1w6 uRPG
space of: incompatible

incompatible
type: Container
type: channel
description: Mit „incompatible“ getaggte Nachrichten auf „1w6 uRPG“!
licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
items: http://sn.1w6.org/notice/39260

http://sn.1w6.org/notice/39260
type: item
type: MicroblogPost
title: drak: @quix0r on #twitter this evolved into a slightly longer (but one-sided) discussion: drak: @adaptivepattern For blind people: Just write clean HTML+CSS pages. Blind people can use those easily. drak: @adaptivepattern: It is 2014: Good webdesign with strong basics: If you require Javascript to read email archives, you do it wrong drak: adaptivepattern: @ArneBab ~ #UX and #JavaScript are not mutually exclusive. A false choice? For #RIA and #SPA, #JS is UX... drak: @adaptivepattern #Javascript makes for horrible #UX, except if you want to constrain your users to have exactly one UX. drak: @adaptivepattern And if you’re going to push #json streams for API-users, why not write clean HTML in the first place? drak: @adaptivepattern The best pages for information I know are simple, static HTML+CSS sites. Also see http://xkcd.com/1309/ drak: @adaptivepattern or click somewhere next to the timeline in #twitter to hide the autocomplete and see your tweet content disappear #grr drak: @adaptivepattern or watch http://xkcd.com/1264/ . Or try to use #itsalltext with G+. #JS = #incompatible, #incoherent #UX drak: @adaptivepattern #damn, now I have to archive all these tweets by hand, because I did not use a client to escape the twitter-ux constraints. drak: @adaptivepattern I see only 2 good reasons for requiring #Javascript: (1/2): Updating small portions of the site without disturbing the user drak: @adaptivepattern and (2/2) deploying cross-platform apps to people who do not control their computers. (1/2) can still keep #JS optional. drak: @adaptivepattern And I know very few examples of full apps in #Javascript which actually yield advantages for the users.
description: drak's status on Tuesday, 07-Jan-14 05:36:07 UTC
encoded: @quix0r on #twitter this evolved into a slightly longer (but one-sided) discussion: drak: @adaptivepattern For blind people: Just write clean HTML+CSS pages. Blind people can use those easily. drak: @adaptivepattern: It is 2014: Good webdesign with strong basics: If you require Javascript to read email archives, you do it wrong drak: adaptivepattern: @ArneBab ~ #UX and #JavaScript are not mutually exclusive. A false choice? For #RIA and #SPA, #JS is UX... drak: @adaptivepattern #Javascript makes for horrible #UX, except if you want to constrain your users to have exactly one UX. drak: @adaptivepattern And if you’re going to push #json streams for API-users, why not write clean HTML in the first place? drak: @adaptivepattern The best pages for information I know are simple, static HTML+CSS sites. Also see http://xkcd.com/1309/ drak: @adaptivepattern or click somewhere next to the timeline in #twitter to hide the autocomplete and see your tweet content disappear #grr drak: @adaptivepattern or watch http://xkcd.com/1264/ . Or try to use #itsalltext with G+. #JS = #incompatible, #incoherent #UX drak: @adaptivepattern #damn, now I have to archive all these tweets by hand, because I did not use a client to escape the twitter-ux constraints. drak: @adaptivepattern I see only 2 good reasons for requiring #Javascript: (1/2): Updating small portions of the site without disturbing the user drak: @adaptivepattern and (2/2) deploying cross-platform apps to people who do not control their computers. (1/2) can still keep #JS optional. drak: @adaptivepattern And I know very few examples of full apps in #Javascript which actually yield advantages for the users.
date: 2014-01-07T05:36:07+00:00
creator: drak
maker: drak
has creator: acct
post icon: https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar.php
licence: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
reply of: http://sn.1w6.org/notice/38874
has discussion: http://sn.1w6.org/conversation/31176
links to: http://xkcd.com/1309/
links to: http://xkcd.com/1264/
tagged: concept

concept
type: Tag
label: damn

concept
type: Tag
label: grr

concept
type: Tag
label: incoherent

concept
type: Tag
label: incompatible

concept
type: Tag
label: itsalltext

concept
type: Tag
label: javascript

concept
type: Tag
label: js

concept
type: Tag
label: json

concept
type: Tag
label: ria

concept
type: Tag
label: spa

concept
type: Tag
label: twitter

concept
type: Tag
label: ux

drak
type: Agent
nick: drak
holds account: acct