1w6 uRPG 1w6 uRPG
  • Anmelden
  • Öffentlich

    • Öffentlich
    • Gruppen
    • Beliebt
    • Verzeichnis

Unterhaltung

Nachrichten

  1. drak drak

    “Urgent action is needed for…” ← FUCK IT, why do we have a GOVERNMENT again? Dear delegates, please act in the interest of your voters!

    Monday, 03-Feb-14 20:02:13 UTC von Choqok
    • mlinksva, windigo und cmhobbs gefällt das.
    • zoowar zoowar

      They are: one dollar, one vote.

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 20:04:37 UTC
    • cyberkiller cyberkiller

      @drak true, I'm also growing tired of signing petitions every single day, what's the point if they're gonna come up with another crap? :-/

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 20:23:43 UTC
    • cyberkiller cyberkiller

      @drak it's a non stop whack-a-mole, it seems their plan is to get us bored & tired of fighting, then they'll drop the real bombs :-/

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 20:25:31 UTC
    • drak drak cyberkiller

      @cyberkiller A petition is the prequel to resignation. A demonstration holds the menace of rebellion. They only listen when we walk.

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 22:52:22 UTC
      erkanyilmaz gefällt das.
    • drak drak zoowar

      @zoowar that’s where corruption leads us. Media-control and bought decisions. But it is luckily not yet the full reality (again).

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 23:04:38 UTC
    • zoowar zoowar

      It's easy to subvert the system when the unthinking majority are easily distracted by shiny objects.

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 23:13:35 UTC
    • drak drak zoowar

      @zoowar yes

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 23:16:32 UTC
    • drak drak zoowar

      @zoowar and I’m careful with thinking bad of the majority. I also got led astray by Gauck - the current neoliberal preacher president of !de

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 23:23:35 UTC
    • zoowar zoowar

      Sure. The unthinking majority is a group of people who influence the outcome of an issue without reasonable consideration of the issue. The scope need not be the entire population.

      Monday, 03-Feb-14 23:35:00 UTC
    • drak drak zoowar

      I think that “unthinking” majority is not as unthinking as it appears. It’s pretty hard nowadays to untangle the web of lies we’re being fed

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 12:51:44 UTC
    • zoowar zoowar

      Yes, but I don't think people are trying any harder than they were years ago. There is simply too much information for non-experts to consume in understanding any given issue.

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 17:05:24 UTC
      drak gefällt das.
    • drak drak zoowar

      I agree, yes. We would need better media, so we don’t have to piece together everything ourselves. Media we can trust…

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 17:18:00 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @drak on DE's recent federal elections right after the PRISM scandal Pirates still only got 3%. Looks like unthinking voters to me.

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 17:38:10 UTC
    • drak drak mcscx

      @mcscx but the left and the greens together got about 16%, and both had also spoken against surveillance.

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 18:39:16 UTC
      inscius gefällt das.
    • mcscx mcscx

      @drak but that's AFAIR not a notable percentage increase compared to the previous federal elections

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 18:48:34 UTC
    • drak drak mcscx

      @mcscx I think for the left it is (but I’m not sure there). The greens lost after being target of a concentrated smear-campaign.

      Tuesday, 04-Feb-14 21:40:03 UTC
    • drak drak mcscx

      @mcscx: no, I just checked. Only those won who want to censor the net: http://www.wahlrecht.de/ergebnisse/bundestag.htm

      Wednesday, 05-Feb-14 01:01:23 UTC
      mcscx gefällt das.
    • laurelrusswurm laurelrusswurm

      @drak Am I reading it wrong? Looks like you doubled your pirates.

      Wednesday, 05-Feb-14 01:06:32 UTC
    • drak drak laurelrusswurm

      the pirates went from 2.0 to 2.2 (in german, the comma is used to separate the below-0 numerals → 2,2(de) == 2.2(us))

      Wednesday, 05-Feb-14 07:38:15 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @drak that's part of the problem: voters are more interested in smear campaigns of boulevard newspapers etc. rather than the big matters

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 01:15:43 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 mcscx

      @mcscx @drak Problem is not lies,info-overload,bad media,evil politicians etc It's the belief in practical constraints that reduces options.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 01:47:13 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 mcscx

      @mcscx @drak Problem is not lies,info-overload,media,politicians etc It's the belief in practical constraints & "facts" that reduces options

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 01:49:22 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 and where does this belief come from?

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 07:22:45 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak e.g., from naive trust in technology & technical fixes, incapability to deal w/ complexity, control fetishization, laziness, etc.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 13:35:26 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak need more? cf. http://is.gd/xy0zBn http://is.gd/PsfHMu http://is.gd/AX7At9 ;)

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 13:43:46 UTC
    • drak drak

      @simsa or from media which influences you - the only way to avoid that is to not consume it - and not to have friends who do…

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:26:15 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 your articles do not strike home with me. If technology where such a force, we would all be using Gnutella to get media.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:28:27 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 Technology nowadays is managed. It influences the flow of power, but at the same time, the flow of power controls tech.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:30:30 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak who is "we all"?

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:33:23 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak No technolgy can be managed, due to the complexities it creates & problems of adminstrattive oversight that are involved.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:35:54 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak What you're saying betrays the same kind of blind trust in technology we've seen till the 60s. It became fashionable again under Kohl.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:39:51 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak (No offence intended, really.)

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:42:09 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak The most I see that technolgy can be said to be controllable is that it's ppl that can be pressured to comply to ensure it's running.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 14:43:17 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 “we all” is almost everyone who wants to watch a video or listen to a song.

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 16:30:14 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak why should gnutella have the potential of a pervasive technology?

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 17:58:44 UTC
    • zoowar zoowar

      Evolution. We either trust the community when they tell us not to eat that mushroom, or we don't. Most of the time we die when we don't trust them and eat the mushroom. Occasionally, we prove them wrong. Today we have science to turn to, but this …

      Thursday, 06-Feb-14 19:31:27 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 because #Gnutella had been spreading despite all lawsuits and threads of rape in prison - until the developers were sued.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 08:09:19 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 Gnutellas place was then taken by BitTorrent, Streaming sites and Filehosters — all of them far easier to control.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 08:11:44 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 Gnutella (and other p2p search networks) provided a whole new experience of media: Everything was at your fingertips.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 08:18:34 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 it was the biggest public library, and it got burned down: http://draketo.de/light/english/generation-cultural-freedom

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 08:21:01 UTC
    • drak drak zoowar

      Sure, but today we trust the few folks who control the media instead of trusting the community → evolution turned upside down

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 09:41:21 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak Whether it was "the biggest public library" I can't say. But you seem to bemoan the loss of an infrastructure, not a technology.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 12:54:49 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak In fact, the tech seems to be the same, only the way it comes to have impact changed. That some tech is pushed instead of others I >

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 12:57:04 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak > didn't deny,; neither that there is greed or powerplay.I's these features that align ppl w/ the centralising character of tech.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 13:00:43 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak > didn't deny; nor that there is greed or powerplay. It's such features of ppl that aligns them w/ the centralizing tendency of tech.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 13:35:54 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      the tech is different: Gnutella needs no centralized components: It was tech which united decentralization with convenience.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 17:30:31 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 isn’t infrastructure just adopted tech? Is tech relevant if no one uses it?

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 17:31:44 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak 1. infrastructure is a result of application of tec in accordance w/goals,planning,laws. So obviously, it is not "jut adopted tech". >

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 19:42:54 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak 2. e.g., nuclear weapons are relevant (even in daily politics) if even no-one actually uses them. The possibilty of usage suffices.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 19:44:26 UTC
    • zoowar zoowar simsa01

      Infrastructure can be adopted tech, as is the case with adhock networks.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 19:46:48 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak This individual case may be poster child of a minority.But it's features are common in other software as well. Open or closed, no diff

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 19:48:09 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 zoowar

      @zoowar true, but that wasn't @drak 's contention.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 19:48:45 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 “poster child of a minority” — that’s quite a way to call tech which was used by millions.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 21:45:11 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 “application of tech in accordance with …” ← that sounds pretty much like “adoption” to me. Maybe we use words differently.

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 22:26:23 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak the key phrase is "is _a_ result of," you want it to be "identical" ...

      Friday, 07-Feb-14 23:53:28 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak Yes,I'd call 2,2-3 million users a minority.But that's not the issue.Individual products use tech features likewise embedded in others

      Saturday, 08-Feb-14 00:03:50 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak Just have a look into this explication of "infrastructure" that doesn't rely on tech in explanans : http://is.gd/Q6E0n2

      Saturday, 08-Feb-14 00:19:28 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 you are much more deeply invested into this discussion than me. I just gave you examples from my experience which seem to not fit…

      Saturday, 08-Feb-14 15:42:32 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 in those examples, politics drove technology. The tech pushed for decentralization. How to explain that in your model is up to you

      Saturday, 08-Feb-14 15:47:32 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak As far as I recall you only gave 1 example, gnutella. You may be right to infer from here about "network tech" as "new" species, >

      Sunday, 09-Feb-14 01:08:50 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak > even that network tech will gain bigger share in tech, production, dissemination, consumption (as a whole). But even than will >

      Sunday, 09-Feb-14 01:09:19 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01

      @drak > it support my contention that complexity makes tech unmanageable. Whether to embrace or bemoan that is a different matter.

      Sunday, 09-Feb-14 01:10:06 UTC

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Hilfe
  • Über
  • FAQ
  • AGB
  • Privatsphäre
  • Quellcode
  • Version
  • Kontakt

1w6 uRPG ist ein Mikrobloggingdienst von Arne (Drak) Babenhauserheide. Es wird mit der Mikrobloggingsoftware StatusNet (Version 1.1.1-release) betrieben, die unter der GNU Affero General Public License erhältlich ist. The running version includes the patches from draketo.de/proj/statusnet-patches.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Alle Inhalte und Daten von 1w6 uRPG sind unter der Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Lizenz verfügbar.