1w6 uRPG 1w6 uRPG
  • Anmelden
  • Öffentlich

    • Öffentlich
    • Gruppen
    • Beliebt
    • Verzeichnis

Unterhaltung

Nachrichten

  1. tuttle tuttle zoowar

    Nations are mechanisms to install the Stockholm syndrome in the people they rule over. We'd fight for, and…

    Wednesday, 02-Apr-14 15:53:36 UTC von somsants.net in 41°22'21"N 2°9'16"O
    • drak gefällt das.
    • simsa01 und drak wiederholte dies.
    • drak drak

      Democracy is a way to reduce this effect - but it is always in danger of being corrupted by those with power or money.

      Thursday, 03-Apr-14 10:47:16 UTC
    • tuttle tuttle drak

      @drak Democracy might help improve things if we did actually live in one. Voting once every four years is called a democracy, but that doesn't necessarily mean it is.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 07:48:04 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @tuttle @drak Democracy is not a cure but the tool to assemble the citizens in the Stockholm syndrome > acceptance of practical constraints.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:15:12 UTC
    • drak drak

      @tuttle: more exactly: democracy ⇒ voting, but voting ⇏ democracy.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:20:45 UTC
      tuttle gefällt das.
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0: I disagree. If you get together with 4 friends and you disagree on the restaurant, you can vote. That’s already democracy

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:25:17 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0: And there *are* practical constraints: If you have 10 liters of water and 10 people, you can’t give everyone 2 liters.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:31:14 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak Voting is part of the democratic process, but both are not identical.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:34:52 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak My reply was more about how voting & democratic process make ppl acquiesce in a shared sense of reality, i.e., practical constraints.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:39:30 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0: In the example I named, they are identical, if the vote is a majority vote: we do what gets the highest number of votes.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:40:04 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak IF your system of democracy is based on the majority rule. But is the only rule possible, sensible or ever practised.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:44:57 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0: It only becomes problematic if people invent practical constraints which do not actually exist.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:45:18 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak IF your system of democracy is based on this numerical rule of the majority. Which isn't the only rule sensible or ever practised.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:46:40 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak And the decision about that is in the hand of those with privileged access to reality?

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:50:21 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0: That’s a good clarification, yes. There are different implementations of democracy.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:50:43 UTC
    • speeddefrost speeddefrost drak

      Usually 'people' in this context would mean "the 0.1%." - and contraints such as "you're not allowed to grow this plant because dirty mexicans."

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:50:53 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 I agree on the shared sense of reality: If you take a decision as group, you need that to some degree - if only to ensure that you all interpret the result similarly.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:53:55 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak Yes. & all,I guess,bind participants into a communal body by "arguing" about what is the practical constraint at hand & how 2 solve it

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:56:49 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak In this sense I see democacy not as a tool (to reach decisions) but as a way to bind all participants into 1 shared view of what's up.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 09:59:25 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak "Practical constraints" or "problems" are vehicles 2 achieve that.This shared sense is what I alluded 2 derisively as Stockholm syndr.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 10:01:27 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 It would only be Stockholm syndrome, if the practical constraints weren’t real *and* from an external force.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 10:04:25 UTC
    • simsa01 simsa01 drak

      @drak If they aren't real they can't origin from an external force.

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 11:23:34 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 they can be real, but from an internal force (which could be changed by a majority vote but is taken as fixed constraint).

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 12:56:53 UTC
    • drak drak simsa01

      @simsa0 or they could be imagined to come from an external force. There could be external people claiming that the constraint exists (but most likely the source of imagined external constraints will be internal).

      Friday, 04-Apr-14 13:00:54 UTC

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Hilfe
  • Über
  • FAQ
  • AGB
  • Privatsphäre
  • Quellcode
  • Version
  • Kontakt

1w6 uRPG ist ein Mikrobloggingdienst von Arne (Drak) Babenhauserheide. Es wird mit der Mikrobloggingsoftware StatusNet (Version 1.1.1-release) betrieben, die unter der GNU Affero General Public License erhältlich ist. The running version includes the patches from draketo.de/proj/statusnet-patches.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Alle Inhalte und Daten von 1w6 uRPG sind unter der Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Lizenz verfügbar.