Antworten an drak, Seite 23

grmpyoldman drak

@drak schwer zu sagen – bei mir hat es geklappt (falls das das Ziel war) – ich betrachte seitdem JEDE Äußerung als bewusst geplant.

mcscx drak , grmpyoldman

@drak @grmpyoldman ich find den Artikel ganz gut. Aber ein Foto eines AfD-Politikers hätte man nicht zeigen müssen.Überall ständig AfD-Fotos

grmpyoldman drak

@drak danach sieht man evtl aber die neuen Meldungen aber aus einem anderen Licht (ich zumindest) und kann entsprechend handeln.

mutoshack drak

Woah, are you the same person who did the "Going from Python to Guile Scheme" article?

Hurd is a nice project, I like it. Maybe I'll contribute to the development someday.

sonyam drak

@drak your GS instance is different: What is? : O http://sn.1w6.org/

vloev drak

@drak It doesn't really matter what they put in their description though.
What matters is if the shit they post on wikipedia is true and I think annoying communities edit warring their way to the top isn't a great strategy for posting true shit.

vloev drak

@drak ah, right
I had only seen the that post --> http://sn.1w6.org/notice/196156

vloev drak , somercet

@somercet @drak 
This is the fist thing I could find
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism#2016_Art.2BFeminism_Wikipedia_Edit-a-thon
they call em edit-a-thons but whatever

somercet drak , vloev

Any links on feminist Wiki-editing parties? @vloev @drak

vloev drak

@drak That's a far bigger problem than just relevant to one poitical group and it's not just on one side of the political spectrum (feminist wikipedia editing parties exist). And once you have wikiepdia editing parties there's only two ways…