> There is real structural inequality within different groups of non-privileged people, which should be reduced
@drak Indeed. The trick is how to approach that.
One of the worst ones is to divide people by gender, race or hair colour and then pick only the more oppressed ones.
Even if a group like that is more oppressed, it is still just a bunch of random individuals.
And the powers-that-be can easily mitigate one's efforts by cherry-picking from those groups individuals that can be made invested in the status-quo. It not only can be done, it has been done.
> all groups need to keep in mind that they need to stand together to fight to reduce the gap to those who stand above all.
@drak Yeah. So of course that should be the primary focus.
Like politicians that actually advocate for affordable healthcare, cheaper higher education, a progressive taxation scale, support for small businesses (against lobbying, software patents, etc.), and don't have mystery money (have what's called integrity).
These things don't have a loud label "to help minorities", because they help the _whole_ majority, including all the minorities within.