1w6 uRPG 1w6 uRPG
  • Anmelden
  • Öffentlich

    • Öffentlich
    • Gruppen
    • Beliebt
    • Verzeichnis

Unterhaltung

Nachrichten

  1. mk mk

    I can't believe it... my Photo drive is about to die, the RAID station with my /home partition had loads of errors which caused it to be remounted read-only - so I rebooted to repair that, and now that that was successful (phew!) the …

    Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 18:41:00 UTC von oracle.skilledtests.com
    • mk mk

      @mk just checking for bad sectors is going to take about 5 hours - of which a little over 50 minutes have now elapsed. That's to be followed by another fsck, of course. *sigh* large disks are nice, but copying, checking and repairing take *very* long #ihatehardware

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 19:22:55 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @mk may be a good idea to get a dd copy of the damaged filesystem to a new disk first.Tools like fsck and chkdsk sometimes make things worse

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:18:52 UTC
    • mk mk mcscx

      @mcscx too late ;-) and I have my doubts if that would work when fsck just aborted. that said, the disk fsck is checking now was used to make a copy of my read-only-mounted /home partition - with a lot of errors - I wonder if that may…

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:24:41 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer mcscx

      @mk @mcscx this is a really good idea , make an image, just in case as a backup.

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:26:23 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer but I've already had to make changes just to get the check for bad sectors running - so is it still a good idea?

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:27:58 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk if is already running leave it and commend yourself to the FSM (i'm being melodramatic here) , if not , try it just in case .

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:35:34 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer FSM? it's just running a scan for bad block now; that's to be followed by a 'regular' fsck run - so should I precede that regular fsck with a dd?

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:38:23 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Spaghetti_Monster ;-) , i'd do it, probably you won't need it but is always good to have it

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:42:30 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer :D oh, that! OK, since I do already have a (one) spare disk (of the same type) I'll do that tomorrow - the bad blocks run won't finish before I get into my #hammock but should be finished when I get up. I'd rather have so…

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:49:17 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk just clone the disk into a image in another disk

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:53:35 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer okie - I'll study dd #tomorrow :)

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 20:57:12 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk last time i did something like that was a lot of reading about dd , fsck, parted. But it was becaused i made a big stupid mistake.

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 21:00:12 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer I suspect FSM is throwing these things at me so I'll learn these trouble shooting and repair commands ;-/

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 21:04:11 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer and then there is TestDisk, too - ya never know if I need it or could use it.

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 21:05:25 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk welcome to the wonderful world of fuckups, lots of "interesting" reading, some magic spells and a lot of swearing :-)

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 21:38:24 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @mk it's just "dd if=/dev/sourcedevice of=/dev/targetdevice". I usually add bs=1024k for more speed.

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 22:59:55 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @mk better don't rely on testdisk/photorec. It may rescue a lot of your photos, but without the filenames!

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 23:02:43 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @mk dd will work if the hardware is ok. If the hardware is NOT ok, better *don't* write w/fsck on it.There's sdd & ddrescue for broken disks

      Wednesday, 25-Jun-14 23:07:19 UTC
    • mk mk mcscx

      @mcscx I wasn't counting on TestDisk for anything but last resort. I came across it when searching for a way to "repair" my old photo drive but ended up not needing it.

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 04:33:02 UTC
    • mk mk mcscx

      @mcscx hmm - I don't seem to have sdd and ddrescue. I'll wait with installing those until the bad blocks scan is finished and I know results...

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 04:45:18 UTC
    • mk mk mcscx

      @mcscx OK, can't find 'sdd' anywhere, but Fedora has 'dd_rescue' and (what mostly supersedes it) 'ddrescue'; Debian has 'gddrescue' which seems to be actually 'ddrescue'. so I'll install that if needed

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 07:29:41 UTC
    • mk mk

      @mk also, bad block scan is finished now (ended up taking more than 12 hours). now, e2fsck tells me there are 'multiply-claimed blocks' in 3 inodes. It offers to clone those blocks but I aborted: want to do dd (or ddrescue if needed) first now... (firster, a trip to the farmacy)

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 07:32:40 UTC
    • mk mk

      @mk if I understand the output correctly, NO bad blocks have actually been recorded because the 'multiply-claimed blocks' are shared with "the bad blocks inode": apparently it won't write those bad blocks before cloning those blocks f…

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 07:41:21 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @mk is this actually the single drive we are talking about? The RAID should never have bad blocks.

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 08:40:25 UTC
    • mk mk mcscx

      @mcscx yes, this is a single drive. the RAID station seems fine now but I'll hve to watch if it (remounting ro) occurs again

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 09:03:10 UTC
    • mcscx mcscx

      @mk may now be a good idea to back up all the files on RAID with tar, rsync or cp -a.

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 09:16:44 UTC
    • mk mk mcscx

      @mcscx yes, I made a backup while it was still RO - but that backup sits on the single drive I'm now repairing... :( Just installed the extra drive and I'm going to dd the single drive to there - AFTER formating it (AS ext4) and check…

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 09:25:08 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk hi any news on the recovery?

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 12:27:19 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer hi :) Installed extra drive, formatted as EXT4, and I'm now checking *that* for bad sectors (42% done); the othr single drive had bad sectors, but could not record them because the "bad block inode" was in use by files, s…

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 12:52:08 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer actually, I'm thinkng that - since I *know* there are errors on the (old) disk, I'd better go straight to using ddrescue instead of dd to create a clone on the new disk (which, so far (71%), does not seem to have any bad blocks)

      Thursday, 26-Jun-14 15:03:17 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk hi, i've been disconnected, how did the disk affair end? If it ended.

      Wednesday, 02-Jul-14 20:39:56 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer no end yet. Don't know where you left off, but in short: failing drive copied to new one with ddrescue; now using that to copy to from my old Photos drive (that's nowhere near finished yet). did e2fsck with read-write tes…

      Wednesday, 02-Jul-14 21:02:11 UTC
    • mk mk ghostdancer

      @ghostdancer s/'lsit'/'list'/

      Wednesday, 02-Jul-14 21:03:29 UTC
    • ghostdancer ghostdancer

      @mk looks like you're having a really "fun" time, good luck

      Wednesday, 02-Jul-14 23:00:14 UTC

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Hilfe
  • Über
  • FAQ
  • AGB
  • Privatsphäre
  • Quellcode
  • Version
  • Kontakt

1w6 uRPG ist ein Mikrobloggingdienst von Arne (Drak) Babenhauserheide. Es wird mit der Mikrobloggingsoftware StatusNet (Version 1.1.1-release) betrieben, die unter der GNU Affero General Public License erhältlich ist. The running version includes the patches from draketo.de/proj/statusnet-patches.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Alle Inhalte und Daten von 1w6 uRPG sind unter der Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Lizenz verfügbar.