Mit „javascript“ getaggte Nachrichten, Seite 6
-
@daw I might be more interested if I could see what the site does without enabling #JavaScript first. In almost all cases, a #JavaScrippled site signals malicious intent (e.g., surreptitious user tracking on that site and others).
-
@R51 For secure browsers that choose not to use #Javascript, can you provide at least the site name, description and logo?
-
Kill all #javascript.
Thursday, 08-Jan-15 16:32:17 UTC von social.umeahackerspace.se in 63°49'42"N 20°15'34"O Wiederholt von lnxw48 -
Kill all #javascript.
-
(1 + "2") / 6 → 2; (1 + 2) / 6 → 0.5 — YIKES! #javascript
-
Some #JavaScript on JD wasn’t loading for me (when the JS then builds the whole page, that means the page remains empty) for a couple of hours, but it is working again.
-
A #gisce busquen programadors #python i/o #javascript per treballar amb #OpenERP i #GIS http://gisce.net/jobs
-
Why is Progressive Enhancement so unpopular? Because forcing you to keep wide open to #JavaScript makes it easier to serve ads and do tracking. #JavaScrippled sites stink.
-
Why is Progressive Enhancement so unpopular? Because forcing you to keep wide open to #JavaScript makes it easier to serve ads and do tracking. #JavaScrippled sites stink.
-
When I let @GOTransit infest my browser with #Javascript all I get is a simple <table> anyway.
-
A schedule is simple tabular data; why does @GOTransit need to fill my browser with #Javascript?
-
Using #JavaScript to modify Ebay listings for fraudulent purposes. http://url.federati.net/Iu2Fa Another reason why JS should be OFF by default. !security
-
Guix with #Javascript??? !GNU #Guix with #Wisp! → http://draketo.de/proj/guix-js-wisp/
Tuesday, 01-Apr-14 12:16:14 UTC von web -
@grmpyoldman game engine #redwire is based upon #javascript? :-/ #fosdem
-
I may be sick... I'm starting to feel some affection to #javascript and #nodejs
-
@quix0r on #twitter this evolved into a slightly longer (but one-sided) discussion: drak: @adaptivepattern For blind people: Just write clean HTML+CSS pages. Blind people can use those easily. drak: @adaptivepattern: It is 2014: Good webdesign with strong basics: If you require Javascript to read email archives, you do it wrong drak: adaptivepattern: @ArneBab ~ #UX and #JavaScript are not mutually exclusive. A false choice? For #RIA and #SPA, #JS is UX... drak: @adaptivepattern #Javascript makes for horrible #UX, except if you want to constrain your users to have exactly one UX. drak: @adaptivepattern And if you’re going to push #json streams for API-users, why not write clean HTML in the first place? drak: @adaptivepattern The best pages for information I know are simple, static HTML+CSS sites. Also see http://xkcd.com/1309/ drak: @adaptivepattern or click somewhere next to the timeline in #twitter to hide the autocomplete and see your tweet content disappear #grr drak: @adaptivepattern or watch http://xkcd.com/1264/ . Or try to use #itsalltext with G+. #JS = #incompatible, #incoherent #UX drak: @adaptivepattern #damn, now I have to archive all these tweets by hand, because I did not use a client to escape the twitter-ux constraints. drak: @adaptivepattern I see only 2 good reasons for requiring #Javascript: (1/2): Updating small portions of the site without disturbing the user drak: @adaptivepattern and (2/2) deploying cross-platform apps to people who do not control their computers. (1/2) can still keep #JS optional. drak: @adaptivepattern And I know very few examples of full apps in #Javascript which actually yield advantages for the users.
-
@drak Not just #Google I also saw many other pages that refuse to work without #JavaScript. :-(
-
@drak Not just #Google I also saw many other pages that refuse to work without #JavaScript. :-(
-
“To use google groups, please activate #Javascript in your browser” … my w3m does not *have* Javascript! #google is #breakingtheweb